Uniswap Faces Lawsuits for Unregistered Offer and Sale of Digital Tokens

Uniswap

Nessa Risley, an Uniswap user from North Carolina, invested about $10,400 on low-cap digital tokens such as EthereumMax, Matrix Samurai, and Rocket Bunny between May and July of last year. The trader has since experienced “substantial losses” and thus sought justice through legal action.

On April 4, Risley filed the lawsuit, alleging that Uniswap failed to conduct identity checks and impose securities restrictions on “fraudsters” who use the platform to list digital tokens from scam type to carry out rampant fraud.

Uniswap accused of selling unregistered securities

Two U.S. law firms have filed a lawsuit against Uniswap, suing the decentralized exchange and its backers, including well-known venture capitalists like A16z and Paradigm, for “violating securities laws in offering and selling securities in the form of digital tokens”.

The lawsuit filed by Kim & Serritella LLP and Barton LLP aims to invite victims like Risley, who have lost money since last April on Uniswap, to join a class action against the founders and developers of the platform. It claimed that Uniswap has failed to disclose “registration statements,” including information regarding the risk of the associated investments for the securities they were selling to the users.

Additionally, the class action claims that Uniswap Labs allowed illegal activities such as “pump and dump” and “pull rugs” on its platform. One of the main accusations targets the DEX’s fee structure, which the statement says encourages fraud by paying liquidity providers a portion of the fee for each transaction.

Meanwhile, Uniswap collects fees for developers, with the ability to keep a portion of those fees for itself. The conflicting interest involved potentially put Uniswap as a silent facilitator of scams.

SEC eyes Uniswap

The above lawsuit is not the first to question the decentralized principle of DeFi protocols. In January, a gambling crypto savings protocol, PoolTogether, was legally challenged by a software engineer named Joseph Kent, who claimed that practicing the protocol is essentially a form of lottery prohibited by New York law.

Last September, the SEC opened an investigation against Uniswap Labs, as the top US securities watchdog was trying to determine how customers were utilizing the exchange, how it was marketed, and how it operated in general. Previously, the SEC’s chairman Gary Gensler outlined concerns over DeFi protocols which, he believed, could be classified as the types of entities the Commission oversees.

admin

Read Previous

Brazilian Congress Aims to Pass Unified Crypto Framework in Coming Months

Read Next

Bitcoin, Ethereum Technical Analysis: BTC, ETH Prices Mainly Unchanged to Start the Weekend

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Right Menu Icon